Showing posts with label Lee Daniel's 'The Butler'. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lee Daniel's 'The Butler'. Show all posts

Monday, August 19, 2013

Film Review: Lee Daniels' 'The Butler'

The ButlerThe director of “Precious” and “The Paperboy” plays things relatively straight in “Lee Daniels’ The Butler,” a sprawling, highly fictional biopic of longtime White House butler Eugene Allen that also positions itself as a panoramic snapshot of the African-American experience across nine decades. But if Daniels has tamped down the kinky sexuality and outre stylistic flourishes for his first PG-13 outing, his handprints can still be found in the film’s volatile mix of acting styles, gratuitous sentimentality cut with moments of real emotional power, and a tone that seesaws between serious social melodrama and outsized chitlin’-circuit theatrical. At its root the kind of starry, old-fashioned prestige pic the studios used to make, this stealthy late-summer release from the Weinstein Co. (smartly moved up from its original fall date) stands to make a modest killing with oxygen-deprived adult moviegoers, whom the pic will have pretty much to itself between now and the start of awards season.

First reported in a 2008 Washington Post article by Wil Haygood, the story of Allen — who served as a White House butler under eight administrations, eventually achieving the position of maitre d’ — is the stuff that many a producer’s Oscar dreams are made of. So much so that it’s shocking it took years, and more than 40 credited producers of varying kinds, to actually get it to the screen. It’s history as seen through the eyes of the humble envoy to the great men of his time: a black “The King’s Speech” or “The Remains of the Day.” (Daniels himself has likened the film to “Forrest Gump,” a comparison that holds for both good and ill.) And if the real life of your protagonist isn’t inherently dramatic enough … well, that’s what Hollywood screenwriters are for.
So Daniels and writer Danny Strong (a Beltway specialist whose credits include “Recount” and “Game Change”) transform Allen into the fictionalized Cecil Gaines, whose life begins inauspiciously on a Georgia cotton plantation in the 1920s, where he witnesses both of his sharecropper parents (David Banner and Mariah Carey) brutalized by the snarling white boss man (Alex Pettyfer, in one of the pic’s more thankless roles). Shown pity by the elderly matriarch (Vanessa Redgrave), the boy Cecil (Michael Rainey Jr.) is made a “house nigger” and trained in the ways of serving whites that will benefit him over the course of his career. (“The room should feel empty when you’re in it,” Redgrave instructs.)
That kicks off a rather pro-forma account of Gaines’ ascent through the ranks of servitude, first as the teenage apprentice to a kindly North Carolina hotel butler (Clarence Williams III), then on to Washington, D.C.’s swank Excelsior Hotel, where the now-adult Cecil (Forest Whitaker) catches the eye of a senior Truman staffer. The White House scenes that follow prove livelier and more interesting, as Gaines gets indoctrinated by a fussbudget maitre d’ (the excellent Colman Domingo) and learns the ropes from the reigning head butler (Cuba Gooding Jr.) and his second-in-command (Lenny Kravitz). In one of the few observations that Daniels doesn’t drive home with a sledgehammer, the presidential mansion is seen as a veritable simulacrum of the plantation house, with the same expectation of “invisibility” for service staff, who are also instructed to see nothing and hear nothing of the sometimes momentous events taking place before them.
Where “Forrest Gump” kept its parade of historical personages restricted to real archival footage, however, “The Butler” nearly capsizes in the first hour under a flotilla of special-guest-star presidents and first ladies who seem imported directly from Madame Tussauds. Given Daniels’ background as a casting director and the savvy stunt casting he’s done in the past, it’s stunning how off most of the calculations are here, from Robin Williams’ embalmed Eisenhower to Alan Rickman’s ghoulishly overacted Reagan. And while Strong has written a sly, funny scene in which then-vice president Nixon panders for votes among the kitchen staff, John Cusack is so un-Nixonian in the role that the whole thing feels like a put-on. (Tyler Perry would have been preferable.) Liev Schreiber and James Marsden fare better as LBJ and JFK, respectively, even if their scenes never quite transcend a certain mechanical, Illustrated Classics feel. Amazingly, the film omits one of the juiciest anecdotes from Haygood’s article, in which JFK blanches at the sight of Sammy Davis Jr. arriving for an official White House soiree with his white wife May Britt on his arm.
Only Whitaker and his stoic, sentry-like presence keep things from turning completely corny. Gaines is a tricky role to navigate because the character is so inherently recessive, but Whitaker digs in deep and gives a marvelous under-the-skin performance; he seems to catch the very essence of a man who has spent his whole life trying not to be seen. In her first live-action dramatic role since 1998’s “Beloved,” Oprah Winfrey makes the most of her few scenes as Cecil’s dutiful wife, Gloria, though she isn’t given much to work with, and the pic’s efforts to manufacture some third-act marital strife feels plastered on for cheap dramatic effect. Meanwhile, whatever seismic historical events don’t pass under Gaines’ nose at work turn up in his living room like clockwork, thanks to one son, Charlie (Elijah Kelly), who goes off to Vietnam, and another, Louis (David Oyelowo), who devotes himself to the civil-rights struggle.
Yet, almost in spite of itself, the film belatedly springs to life, largely thanks to Oyelowo, who plays Louis from a teenager to a middle-aged man with some help from makeup, but mostly with the transformative inner force of a great actor. Even when the plotting remains leaden and predictable, he’s electrifying to watch, and as the character makes his way through various protest movements (from the Freedom Riders to the Black Panthers), Daniels develops a strong sense of the inner complexities and contradictions of the civil-rights landscape. (When Louis shows up for a family dinner looking like a cross between Che Guevara and Eldridge Cleaver, accusing Sidney Poitier — and, indirectly, Cecil himself — of being an Uncle Tom, the scene is pointed and funny for all the right reasons.) Gradually, the tension between Louis’ increasingly radical views and Cecil’s noncommittal ones becomes the most compelling thing about the movie, and Daniels has the good sense to go with it.
“The Butler” is being sold with the ad line “One quiet voice can ignite a revolution,” and the movie strives to suggest that, by sheer, steady force of presence, Gaines — and men and women like him — managed to have a significant impact on race relations in America. But in dramatic terms, it never quite makes the case. Gaines’ voice is so quiet that it takes him until the 1980s to make a stand for equal pay for blacks on the White House staff — a moment Daniels treats as a watershed, but which seems more like a sad reflection on the slow crawl of racial progress at the seat of government and, by extension, in Hollywood, too, where “Driving Miss Daisy” (which “The Butler” also resembles) was trumping “Do the Right Thing” at the Oscars around the same time Gaines would have been asking for that raise. If this is a revolution, one shudders to think of the status quo.
There’s no denying, though, that Daniels knows how to push an audience’s buttons, and as crudely obvious as “The Butler” can be — whether juxtaposing a Woolworth’s lunch-counter protest with a formal White House dinner, or showing a character keeling over at the breakfast table with oxygen tank attached — it’s also genuinely rousing. By the end, it’s hard not to feel moved, if also more than a bit manhandled.
Pic’s modest $25 million budget — small for a period drama of this scale — is reflected in a White House set with a marked soundstage feel, ill served by cinematographer Andrew Dunn’s gauzy, diffuse lighting schemes. But the costumes by Ruth Carter (“Amistad,” “Malcolm X”) are generally superb, as are the prosthetic makeup effects of Clinton Wayne and Oscar winner Matthew Mungle.


Cuba Gooding Jr., 'Lee Daniels' The Butler' Star, On His Complicated Relationship With Hollywood

cuba gooding jr lee daniels the butler
Here's a story about Cuba Gooding Jr.: Less than two years after winning Best Supporting Actor for the 1996 film "Jerry Maguire," Gooding was supposed to play Special Agent John Royce in 1998's "U.S. Marshals," the fairly forgettable sequel to "The Fugitive." The role would eventually go to Robert Downey Jr., and -- according to Gooding -- it was only then that Wesley Spines was cast as Mark Sheridan, the film's co-lead.
"That's how things go down," Gooding said in an interview with me last week, noting that, at the time, studios were loathe to cast two African-American actors in leading roles. It was this type of behavior that led the 45-year-old New York native to disengage with Hollywood. Then Hollywood disengaged with Cuba Gooding Jr.
In person, Gooding certainly has a presence. I met the Oscar winner at a hotel restaurant to discuss his latest project, "Lee Daniels' The Butler" -- which also happens to currently be the number one movie at the box office -- and can report that there was a bit of a buzz when Gooding walked in -- even amongst what was a relatively sparse lunchtime crowd.
In "The Butler," Gooding plays Carter Wilson, a wise-cracking co-worker of Cecil Gaines (Forest Whitaker) who -- like the film's title subject -- is a service worker at the White House throughout multiple administrations. Our conversation steered from issues such as racism (which is, of course, a central issue in "The Butler") to Gooding's career trajectory pre- and post- his Oscar-winning performance as Rod Tidwell in "Jerry Maguire." But, first, the conversation starts on the topic of Cuba Gooding Jr.'s favorite sport, NHL hockey.
We have met briefly once before. A few months ago you asked if you could sit at a table that my friend had reserved so you could watch the New York Rangers playoff game. You were really into that game.
Yeah, yeah. I've been playing hockey for more than 20 years now. It's my favorite sport. Hands down, my favorite sport.
How did you get into hockey?
My roommate was Canadian and the Kings went to the Stanley Cup Finals in '92-'93 against the Montreal Canadians and he said, "Every game they win, we're going to have a party." I was like, "Party? Sounds good." And I wound up going to the Stanley Cup Finals, and I joined a league that year.
Hockey has always seemed like a hard sport to get started in, with all the equipment. And then learning how to skate.
Isn't that funny? And my philosophy, or mindset on it, was the complete opposite. I had never skated, but I put on so many pads, that when I fell, it felt like I was falling into pillows, so I just would do anything. I would try anything: backwards, stop. And after years of doing it, I finally picked it up.
With "The Butler," this is the second time you've worked with Lee Daniels, following 2005's "Shadowboxer."
Well, I think Lee Daniels is the answer in terms of the newest voice of the generation of auteurs.
He definitely has a voice.
He's specific. And you know when you see his movies, you're going to get a specific type of truth.
With "The Butler," he is reigned a bit -- at least compared to past movies -- but he still gets in some jabs.
He gets them in there. I think what it forced him to do is to go to the heart of every moment, as opposed to being sensationalistic or focused on being shocking in the moment ... so I think he was able to rein himself in for the good of the better cause. And I think, by doing that, it made him simplify his approach. And I think in the simplicity of the approach -- I don't want to throw Spike Lee under the bus, and I feel like I have been lately -- but Spike Lee is a wonderful filmmaker, but I think at some point, his opinions started to overtake his work.
Through his work, or just in general like on Twitter, or something?
I think through his work. You know, "Do the Right Thing" was such a beautiful slice of cinema because you saw this lifestyle in Brooklyn that was something that people didn't know. But then as he started doing these other movies, you could feel that, you know, "Jungle Fever" ...
But what about something like "25th Hour"?
Right. But my point I'm trying to make is specifically race-related. I think when he's dealing with subjects -- and I am going to bring this back to Lee Daniels, but that's my point here -- when you're dealing with the race-relation movies, it's easy to alienate an audience. It's almost like when you're dealing with politics. You're either going to get the Democratic point of view or a Republican point of view or an Independent. And when you make a statement of one, you alienate the other. I think what happens -- in not just Spike Lee movies -- but those specific race movies, is when your opinion is evident, then it makes people feel, "OK, well, that doesn't pertain to me," or, "That does pertain to me." So it's easy for them to get defensive and close out on it. Whereas, I think this approach to the Civil Rights movement was, one, in an epic scale -- but done in a way where it was just a canvas for you to bring your own opinions.
I'm so impressed with Lee as an auteur because he recognized the ability to say that not just black people died during the Freedom Rider bus and the sit-ins -- not just black people were harassed and physically abused. White people sat next to them and were the voice of the other black people that couldn't speak up for themselves ... I laugh when people get caught up with the "nigger" word. You know like, "Oh, you can't say that word, you can't say that word." It's like, well, I know racist guys that I play hockey with that would never in a million years say "nigger." Ever in a million years. But they also never would have a black man in their house. So what is more offensive? The intent behind what your ideology is? Or you not saying a certain word?
The presidents are interesting in this movie. Which president do you think comes off the best in the movie?
Well, that's an interesting question because I'm friends with John Cusack and I was so blown away by what he did in the movie. I mean, he might be my favorite.
Let's say you don't know anything about any president and this is the only way you know these guys. Who do you think comes off the best historically?
I think JFK. I mean, he died for what he believed in. I mean, even though he had to make some hard decisions, you felt that he was genuinely trying to better the country by his behavior and his actions.
I was surprised by how Eisenhower comes off in the movie.
And Eisenhower, too. But it's so funny, because Eisenhower was kind of like -- not neutral, but was he the first president that we saw? Robin Williams, right? Yeah, so I think it is interesting how he comes off. I never really thought about it that way, but yeah.
It's very interesting the way Reagan's portrayed. He cut social programs, but privately he's played as ...
Giving money to people.
Yeah, this guy who really cares and is giving money to people in need.
Now you understand. You're making my statement about his vision and I think it's so wonderful because he understands as a director that you have to build the slide, you have to build the monkey bars, you have to build the sandbox. But you can't tell people where they have to play. You can only allow them to come to the park and let them choose to make their own day at the park. And that's what the film is. He's not being specific about any time and what the opinions are on the Black Panthers or what your opinion is about a certain president. He's saying, "Here's people with their complexity of behavior, and here's the time."
The first thing I ever saw you in was "MacGyver."
[Laughs] My TV show start, yeah.
You played one character, but then you came back as the bounty hunter, Billy Colton.
Oh, you're very, very perceptive. I started out as a runaway kid and that was my first episode and I had this emotional climax. So the producers called my agent and they said, "We would love to have him back on the show." And she was like, "Great. When?" And they were like, "Well, we're trying to make this runaway kid thing work." So a few years passed and they said, "You know what? We're going to bring him back, but a completely different character."
And Della Reese was your mom.
And so what happened was I did two or three episodes as "Billy Colton, sidekick," and then they thought up that idea to make the pilot for the spinoff. And that was actually a pilot; it would be its own thing.
Oh, a backdoor pilot?
That's exactly what it was. And then it didn't get picked up or whatever, but that's how that happened.
And I might be one of the few people who saw "Lightning Jack" in the theaters.
Well, I'm an old cowboy. You know, it's true. I used to compete in cutting horse competitions...
Really?
Yeah. I love horseback riding.
I feel you're getting good roles as of late, but do you feel there was a down period for a while?
It's an acting career that I take very seriously, and there was a period -- you've got to remember, I came from a puritan [background] when it comes to my art -- and I was all about the role and the story and the screenplay. And that, I think, opened me up to filmmakers who gave me a lot of opportunity really quickly. I won the Oscar, and then I was in the studio system. Now, what happened in that time is that I said no to a lot of big directors.
What's an example of that?
Oh, Steven Spielberg for "Amistad" and all the way down. Because, I mean, he's the crème de la crème.
Is that the one you regret the most?
Let me just finish my statement and then you can finish your question, because I need to answer your question. And I think by doing that, what I did is I took myself out of the studio system. Because I wasn't working. I wasn't doing these films. So they thought, Well, okay, we'll move on to the next actor. And instead of being on the A-list, I went all the way down, down, down. And then it opened me up to all this independent cinema. And I wound up working with a lot of first-time directors. I wound up editing; I wound up writing scripts. And it took me back to film school and I think it was an integral part of my growth as a filmmaker. And I think now that I'm in a position to start working with the next generation of filmmakers, I recognize what a good script is now -- I didn't before.
It's really interesting what you just said, because I don't think anyone would argue that the studio system right now isn't broken. You mentioned Spielberg and he's out there saying that. Lucas is saying that. Soderbergh is saying that.
Absolutely.
Do you think that you were always sitting here and the system came back to you a little bit?
No. I think the system was here. It broke. You know, I went my way in the indie world and then so did everything else. And if you look at now these gambles, these quarter of a billion dollar gambles on one movie ...
Like "The Lone Ranger."
Yeah! There's still these great stories that want to be told by filmmakers who can tell them the right way. I mean, think about it: Who would have directed "The Butler" if this was 1986? It might have been a white director who would have come from his point of view of this movie. But now you have a new filmmaker, you have filmmakers of color who are living this life and being able to tell their own story -- like Lee Daniels, like Ryan Coogler, like Steve McQueen.
In five years, where do you want to be?
Directing. That's my end game. I wrote my first screenplay, which I finished, and I'm working on my second pass. I did it because I want to show that I can direct. And then, eventually, hopefully, in five years, I'm having more control over the stories. And hopefully working with great directors, because that's my main goal.
I feel like the way it's set up now, it's easier for that to become a reality than it would have been 10 years ago.
Absolutely. And, again, I think that's all due to this whole fractured Hollywood mentality. You know, the other thing that I fought when I was "hot" in my early 30s was that the studios had to get over the concept of putting a black lead in a major production.
What do you mean? What's an example of that?
Like a movie that I passed on was "U.S. Marshals." And at the time, the studio, they didn't want Wesley Snipes to have that role and me have the Robert Downey Jr. role. They didn't want both. So I passed and so he got the other part. So that's how that was going down then. That's how it went down! That's how things go down, you know? And now, it's a very different time. And I think that the fear that is created by the insecurities that these executives have to hit that dollar is probably always going to be there when it comes to those superbudget movies. But when you want to just tell a good story, then there's an opportunity for that. You know, there's a Lee Daniels to tell the truth of a story like that.
Along with great young African-American actors like Michael B. Jordan.
You know he was in "Red Tails" with me. No, he's my heart. And I know he's the next generation. I see these kids come up: him and David Oyelowo and Nate Parker and there's three or four in our movie -- Elijah Kelley. These are kids that write, produce, direct, and find the money for -- Malcolm Mays is another kid that I just did this movie "Life of a King," which I feel is my answer to "Boyz n the Hood." And this kid is amazing. Tristan Wilds. I mean, there's just so many of these young new kids coming up of color that are thinking of the big picture --and not just focused on their character, but focused on telling a real story.
"Red Tails" was a George Lucas pet project for many years. It surprised me he didn't direct it himself.
I was surprised, too. I really was surprised too, yeah. You know, I have a long relationship with that. I did the first "Tuskegee Airmen." And they were in pre-production with Lucas directing "Red Tails," and because we started production, he put his on the backburner.
It's interesting that you wind up getting "Red Tails."
Well, I had to fight. They didn't want to meet me. They didn't want me. They wanted nothing to do with the original. So I finally got into a meeting with Anthony Hemingway, who's another filmmaker of color who's coming and who's making amazing television. You know, people get caught up, especially with actors, like you say: you've seen a lot of my films. So people see me one way and they can't see me in another until they see me in another way. You know?
But I saw plenty of your work before "Jerry Maguire." Was that almost a problem with "Jerry Maguire"? Because a lot of people, that's the first thing they saw of your work?
Oh, absolutely. I went a year without working right after that movie. And the first role that I got, I was playing a white guy in it, in "What Dreams May Come." I played Robin Williams' son.
You payed Robin Williams' son in the afterlife.
But it was one of those things where my agents were like, "Just meet him." And I walked in and the director and I were talking and he's like, "It's heaven, of course, you can play his son." Great! And that's how I got that role. But there was no other offers or anything for a year.